A question of celebrity endorsements
“NikeLab Introduces a New Version of the Air Oscillate for Roger Federer” screams my Twitter feed. What’s more, this tweet came from The Fed himself.
Roger Federer is a juggernaut as far as marketing is concerned. Considered to be the greatest tennis player of all time, Federer only added to his almost mythical persona by winning the Australian Open in 2017 at 35 – long after everyone had written him off. He remains an unflappable gentleman on and off the court, has four (yes, four!) adorable kids, and is the star attraction wherever he goes. Latest case in point: Pippa Middleton’s wedding. The guy has his own logo, for heaven’s sake.
Therefore it only makes sense that Federer is the face of luxury brands, such as Rolex, Mercedes Benz, Moet & Chandon and Lindt. What is a Rolex? A heavy, garish watch set apart by its price. Is a Nike shoe necessarily superior to cheaper alternatives? Is a Mercedes really that much better than a Toyota?
As they say, if you need to ask….
“Luxury” brands, by definition, defy logic. They are not bought for their value for money or features. The buyer buys the brand, and the right to flaunt it, thereby gaining access to an elite club.
That said, celebrity endorsements are not confined to luxury brands. Remember this?